Lol no, for servers (Epyc) it is the *last* digit. Why? Who knows, to make it mo... | Hacker News

Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

		pezezin 5 days ago \| parent \| context \| favorite \| on: Getting bitten by Intel's poor naming schemes Lol no, for servers (Epyc) it is the last digit. Why? Who knows, to make it more confusing I guess.

zamadatix 4 days ago | [–]

I admit it took me until the 4th gen Epyc to realize this. I laughed out loud at myself/the numbering scheme.

adamsb6 4 days ago | [–]

Well yeah Epyc is little endian

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact