Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> …in mature teams with high trust, people don’t have heated arguments…

This dynamic flourishes when the stakes and/or uncertainty are low enough.

High stakes and high uncertainty means everyone’s pushing their intuition and their reasoning as far as they can. They’re at their limit of what can be communicated efficiently. This results in an uneven distribution of communication bandwidth across the edges in the team network. Accountability induces leadership and competing views are ascendant and in decline.

I think it’s reasonable to wonder that, if the temperature never rises about room temperature, the team might not be fully challenging itself.



>I think it’s reasonable to wonder that, if the temperature never rises about room temperature, the team might not be fully challenging itself.

I suspect this only seems reasonable if you've never experienced a healthy work environment. I probably would have agreed with you when I was in my twenties, working at a startup with another bunch of twenty-year-old guys and a CEO who was in over his head. It wasn't unusual for the whole company to yell at each other in a meeting room. The stakes seemed high then, but they seem ridiculous in hindsight, as does my own behavior.

Thirty years later, the stakes are much higher, and the temperate is much lower. This is precisely because we can't afford this behavior, and we can't afford to deal with people who can't control themselves and behave professionally in high-pressure situations.


My experience agrees with you — which is why I tried to hedge in my statement — but meanwhile tech culture treasures its stories (perhaps just-so stories) of demanding leaders getting better performance from outrageous targets.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: