Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more vincefutr23's commentslogin

If you’re saying “blockchain, not crypto” in 2025, you need to revisit your research process


Do you have risk loss / fraud issues?


Not really. We don’t touch customer money- we just print and mail checks on their behalf.

We do require bank verification via Plaid, which proves the user has a valid username and login to their bank.

We perform further KYC checks for suspicious payments.


For the PFOF skeptics, there isn’t that much money in pfof on liquid large cap stocks.

For the founder, have you thought about doing away with the 1$ for friction reduction while you scale given how tough the switching decision can be?

For the founder, have you considered using ACAT in incentives as a differentiated acquisition tool?

For the founder, are their “moments” people often switch their brokerage you could target aggressively? Ie I imagine Johnny software, 28 , is a hard sell to sit down and port their holding over from fidelity to save a couple of BPS, but maybe people starting their first job? Setting up a retirement plan? What’s your target “moment”?


Where does the garbage get moved too? What if the least societally harmful place for waste is the middle of the pacific ?


Landfills really aren't so bad. Article from a previous HN post:

https://practical.engineering/blog/2024/9/3/the-hidden-engin...


Landfills. Theoceancleanup's own figure is that there is 100,000 tonnes of plastic. This one [0] landfill in Ohio gets 2 million tonnes each year. That's out of ~250 million tonnes produced by the US each year [1]. So it seems there is plenty of room.

0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rumpke_Sanitary_Landfill 1 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landfills_in_the_United_States


So the plan is to spend 7 billion and however much carbon over 10 years to move pollutants from the middle of the Pacific Ocean, thousands of miles from anyone or any rich fisheries, to landfills near population centers?


Well, water is a solvent and dirt isn’t. That’s probably the reason why oil isn’t harmful in the ground and it is harmful when it’s spilled in the ocean.


There’s plenty of water in dirt. Except it’s water next door to population centers using it, not thousands of miles from anyone in the ocean


Why would contaminating the environment of a major food supply be the least harmful place? how is that better than purpose built infrastructure to contain that trash?


is there any commercial fishing in the middle of the pacific? Why is it better to ship it to leech into the groundwater near population centers ?


Can I acat into double?


Yes, we support ACATS. You can initiate these through the app under Transfer Funds.


A good product / VC strategy would be to double down on anything Twitter shuts down about 18 months after

Open APIs > short form mobile video > creator owned long form text?


Substack already exists. Twitter wasn't the innovator in the area, like the other products you mention.


I sincerely doubt that.


Can’t tell you how frustrating it is to build a notifs service from scratch in house. Can’t wait to try this out and add capacity to our sever team


unbelievable, but sadly based on this experience I can see how that would happen and empathize


What do you mean by incoherent?


Not the original commenter, but I was also thrown a bit by the structure of the blog post. Most items posted on HN are on a single topic, and I didn't realize going into this item that I was dropping into a multi-topic finance newsletter.

Based on the title, I was expecting a single, unitary article that was about hedge fund size and tax arbitrage. It took a while for me to realize this was not the case.


I expect to read technology articles here, not the unfocused thoughts of a finance columnist on 5+ different topics.


https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

> On-Topic: Anything that good hackers would find interesting. That includes more than hacking and startups. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual curiosity.


I think it's the unfocused thoughts on a range of different topics that's the problem.

I don't mind reading about non tech things. Rambling musings on the other hand don't really do it for me.


It's not much different than reading 5 separate non-tech posts on HN.


That individually would never have made it to the front page.


Then please adjust your expectation.

It's not in line with the officially stated purpose of this site, nor with the regulars' expectations.


Soecifically for weddings, what was the demographic / criteria that you targeted ?


Women, 24+, interested in family, weddings, gifts, babies, family photos, etc. We kept it to Australia for now, but I'm working on going international.

Since the items integrate the buyer's photo, people also often use them as memorials of dead people, but we didn't specifically target that. Yet.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: