I am having extremely hard time believing this, I don't mean that on paper chance exists but out there in real world, especially with current government. Checking for 2024 the number can be counted on all fingers and toes and all were special high profile cases.
US has a law that they will invade International court of justice if ever any US personnel is tried there (ie for war crimes, that one would be easy to pull on thousands of US citizens). That's the US mindset against other jurisdictions.
You're kidding, right? Boca Raton, FL has been widely recognized as the spam capital of the world for decades, and has nothing to do with ethnicity or religion whatsoever. Eastern Europe is known for being a den of cybercrime groups, and Russia is known to turn a blind eye. China is widely known to cooperate with domestic cybercriminal actors. Non-jewish geographically concentrated threat actors are openly discussed all the time.
The difference is that none of these places operate as legal safe havens for child sex predators.
I did send my details to both of those locations, just in case. No response so far. I also posted on the artist formerly known as twitter, and I know I have some friends there in Google infra, I was hoping they'd pick up on it without calling them out specifically, but I might target them more specifically. Thought it sounds like it might be a deliberate, unfortunate, choice. I just can't understand why they'd want that.
I was surprised not to find a discussion on this ~6 day old blog post already.
Looks like the only change is that the Puppet project's binary distribution will impose 25 node limits without licensing. The source remains Apache 2.0.
I'm assuming someone will distribute binaries without that 25 node limit without issue shortly...
Due to the way WhatsApp does (person to person, not group) chat encryption, the number of messages scales linearly with the number of devices of either party to the conversation.
They probably want to put a cap on how much data/CPU the sending device has to expend per message.
Howdy! FI(H) here. Looks very cool, I watched the video too.
Many students get the hang of hovering within 10 hours - "learning to fly" really isn't that hard? I see the rest of the course as "learning to become a pilot." That means the background knowledge and practice to allow decision making & dealing with emergencies etc.
I think if you could improve just a single one of the problems you touch on (difficult controls, navigation, mass and balance, fly by wire etc) you could make a lot of money...
... But improving all of them in one shot... that sounds unreasonable to me? Are they really connected?
> Our system makes it impossible to lose control of the airplane, potentially solving 80% of today’s fatal accidents in general aviation.
I'd love to see details on how you achieved this... or at least your definition of "impossible"...
You are definitely correct that "learning to become a pilot" is the meat of training. Our belief is that we want to make the continued act of "aviating" as easy as possible so that pilots can focus on the decision making aspect of being a pilot, and when doing so, not let the airplane get ahead of them and cause an accident.
Basically, you can't command the plane to do anything it can't safely do. If you pull the stick full back, you'll just climb at your maximum safe angle of attack. Hold the stick full right, you'll be turning at a 45 degree bank. Compared to todays planes, which you have to actively be on top of and "ahead of" the entire them they are being flown.
I get the idea... but what happens when a pitot tube is blocked or an aoa sensor gets stuck or ... ?
With "traditional" controls and an autopilot failure, you still have control over all the control surfaces.
With your solution, you don't have enough hand axis to fall back to manual flying? How can the computer possibly guarantee safe flight in all conditions?
In the case of an e.g. air speed sensor failure, how do you get on the ground safely? Is the answer "Just BRS"? Or multiple sensors etc. ?
Multiple sensors, actively modeling the flight dynamics to detect anomalous sensors/behaviors (i.e. is what we are measuring what we expect to measure), and BRS as a final backup.
> I registered a new domain at one registrar and immediately asked they change the IPS tag to another. A coworker [saw] ... the tag change, but then I got distracted looking for cake/looking over their shoulder. They set up a new account at the second registrar and claimed the domain, using no secret information and without either registrar or Nominet gaining my consent.
To be clear, the IPS was (is?) publicly visible. So you could poll a list of domains looking for it.
It's worth noting that even if you registered .co.uk with e.g. Gandi, you still get a separate Nominet account with it's own authentication. It doesn't matter if you add 2FA etc - after such a transfer, the domain was registered to a different nominet account.
I saw the film "Soundscape" at the Banff mountain film festival and thought it was great. Looks like it's won awards and been shown at a lot of festivals. Definitely recommend it!
The description:
> Soundscape shares the sightless experience of climbing a mountain via echo location, touch and imagination. It features Erik Weihenmayer, a fully blind adventure athlete and author, as he ascends a massive rock face deep in California’s Sierra Nevada mountains. Using expert camera work and emotive, novel animation to bring to life a concept by adaptive climbing pioneer Timmy O’Neill, the film is a surprising and soulful adventure.
What does Tesla do differently regarding changing product prices that they're worth calling out compared to other companies?
My personal experience is that they honoured my order and delivered a vehicle superior in every metric but "turning radius". (Which has a far higher price if ordered again on my delivery day)
Every company in every industry modifies products and pricing? See e.g. "shrinkflation"
I suspect it'd have a different spin put on it.
reply